My new website !!!

[Cloudbuster]

Hi all, finally got my website up and running at last ...

http://www.thedronefactory.co.uk/

regards rob

[deano]

Not sure if it its the phone but towards the bottom of the first page its way to dark

[Britishguy]

Wix! no offence but use a different system on your own hosting, opencart is great with a simple mod

here';s a site i built for my friends http://valetyourcar.com

took me just days

[Britishguy]

also the social icons all go to wix

[Cloudbuster]

Wix! no offence but use a different system on your own hosting, opencart is great with a simple mod

here';s a site i built for my friends http://valetyourcar.com

took me just days

whatever you do someone will always tell you to do something else... its easy and i have very little time to spend editing so this service suited my needs !!! the social networking stuff will dealt with later (i hate Facebook and twitter)

[Britishguy]

ok thanks

[Oakie]

British Guy nice site!

Cloudbuster, you might like to finish the page at the bottom you have a copyright date of 2023? do you time travel as well

Like the site design, if it helps did take some time to come up?

Just noticed that the contact me page has some missing text for the messaging windows.

Hope it does all you need and more.

Paul

[chester_lad]

Cloudbuster great website . I do love the green and white quadcopter . What motors do you use on your set ups ?

[Cloudbuster]

Cloudbuster great website . I do love the green and white quadcopter . What motors do you use on your set ups ?

generally we use Emax mtrs or T motors !!! all the multi';s shown bar one are using either EMAX 3510 or 3515

regards rob 

[Oakie]

Don';t forget the trade section!!

[malc]

have you got the copyright  on the music once you make money the union will be after you

[Oakie]

Hi, When you supply a multi-rotor what removes you from liability should it cause accidents/damage?

Paul

[barneyg]

Hi, When you supply a multi-rotor what removes you from liability should it cause accidents/damage?

Paul

Probably the same thing that removes the liability from car manufacturers.   Unless there is a serious design flaw it is the owners responsibility to ensure safe operation/airworthiness.

[Oakie]

Hmm, sorry I can';t see the connection between a car manufacturer and  a multi-rotor manufacturer.

It';s not the same thing at all.

As a hobby that';s one side of a coin, As a manufacturer the guarantee lies with the manufacturer.

It';s all too easy to come unstuck if you don';t take care of these thing';s.

[Oakie]

So the question still stands for Cloudbuster.

[Friskle]

There is a connection, if an accident is caused due to faulty parts or bad assembly, then those that built it are liable, eg, testing, quality control etc will all be scrutinized.

If supplied built, yes the saying is, we should check everything first, but legally speaking, if something is sold pre built, or RTF, then all that should have been done, should have, you buy a car, you dont go round it checking every bolts tight, eg you trust the manufacturer, just because its a hobby, why should that trust be any different.

Accidents due to stupidity, or pilot error, and in the event of a claim, found to be only that, then the liability is only on the owner/pilot, exactly the same as someone doing 60 in 30 and killing someone, its not the manufacturer that made them break the speed limit.

The difference is products use, over product/parts being faulty.

[Cloudbuster]

So the question still stands for Cloudbuster.

we are not a manufacturer just a builder !! as previously stated the responsibility passes to the user !! it makes no difference if its a tin of beans or a 747 jet the liability rests with the user unless it is down to faulty manufactured parts which will be the manufacturers liability. as with all items sold we have a service level to which we must meet but beyond that the responsibilty lies with the user. As with any consumer item there is a line of legal protection that protects both the seller and the buyer.

regards rob 

[Biffa]

we are not a manufacturer just a builder !!

Surely you are a manufacturer if you are taking items and manufacturing an end product?

If you buy say a pair of FS goggles and a component inside the goggles fail, that is down to FS not the manufacturer of the component.

[atomiclama]

Surely you are a manufacturer if you are taking items and manufacturing an end product?

If you buy say a pair of FS goggles and a component inside the goggles fail, that is down to FS not the manufacturer of the component.

I';m no expert here but:

Manufacture / builder no real difference you are supplying a product made from parts. It comes back to you. If you can subsequently prove that it was down to one of the parts used then you can take it up with the manufacturer of that part. good luck with that.

The company I work for sell sour products direct and into OEM that use them as a part in their final product. Problems with our product sold direct are delt with by us. problems with the OEM product are delt with by the OEM.

[Friskle]

we are not a manufacturer just a builder !! as previously stated the responsibility passes to the user !! it makes no difference if its a tin of beans or a 747 jet the liability rests with the user unless it is down to faulty manufactured parts which will be the manufacturers liability. as with all items sold we have a service level to which we must meet but beyond that the responsibilty lies with the user. As with any consumer item there is a line of legal protection that protects both the seller and the buyer.

regards rob 

I used to be in the Artic building trade, we assembled artic units, most of the parts are not made in house, we merely assembled them to a finished drivable vehicle, but if that wagon went out, and had an accident, due to bad assembly or faulty part, we were the first port of call, we had to have to artic back, we had to get new parts, we had to reassemble it, we had to foot the costs, if the accident had injured someone or worse, then its us the manufacturer that would be liable, not the user, then they would claim from the manufacturer of the part/component.

so if i buy a tin of beans, and it has some bad ones in it, whos fault is that ?  mine for buying it?, no, who has to replace them?

so when i went on holiday, if something went wrong with the plane, its my fault for being on it ? no, you would sue the Airline, not the people that supplied the part.

of course there is protection either way, but if you did something wrong, that was proven to lead to injury, then sadly its your fault, not the person using it, have you got stringent testing for each part you use? can you guarantee that any part you assemble is fault free, probably not, unless of course the accident was proven to be caused by misuse of the product.

its not quite as simple as saying you built it, you sold it, now anything that goes wrong is the persons fault who buys it.

[Cloudbuster]

LOL !!! this thread was not started to get into consumer rights !!! please please... i have been in business now for over 30 years and am fully aware of the law relating to sale of goods and manufacturing law !! can we lighten up... its clear nobody has anything positive to say about my new site so consider this thread closed !!!!

regards rob 

[DebianDave]

Welcome to the internet, nipicking since 1983 

[atomiclama]

i have been in business now for over 30 years and am fully aware of the law relating to sale of goods and manufacturing law

Not knowing your back ground was just trying to be help ful point somethings out.



Oh yeah good luck with it 

[Friskle]

Nitpicking  ::)

But none was, merely proper comments, as above through not knowing his background.

some of my comments were also based on the fact that i have built multis for over 3 years that go out for sale, so yes, i also know how it works in this field.

That said, many people seem to think there is a difference, due to it being a hobby item.